|
|
|
|
|
by ceequof
3985 days ago
|
|
Page 50: Hey, that's how you're supposed to use heatshrink! Wow, I've been doing it wrong for years. Page 62: Mildly surprised that they don't want crimped connections soldered, but I suppose that compromises flexibility, and shouldn't add all that much strength if they're properly crimped. Page 76: Wow, had never heard of "connector saver" jumpers before. Sounds bananas, but I suppose if you're going to test everything ten times for every launch, it's mostly reasonable. |
|
> Hey, that's how you're supposed to use heatshrink! Wow, I've been doing it wrong for years.
Out of curiosity, how have you been doing it? The way shown in this manual is the standard way to do it in my world.
> Mildly surprised that they don't want crimped connections soldered
I'm confused as to why you would think about soldering a crimped connection. Properly crimped connections will stand up to a good deal more vibration (and are pretty much gas-tight, staving off corrosion) than soldered connections. Plus, crimping is quick and easy with the right tools. Maybe there are some niche applications where you'd do both. I've never seen it.
> Wow, had never heard of "connector saver" jumpers before. Sounds bananas
Totally not bananas when you look at the spec sheet for something like a D38999 series connector. Connector savers are a normal thing in the aerospace world. Most connectors are only rated for a few hundred mate/demate cycles (Usually 250 or 500). Every time you mate or de-mate a connector you run the risk of damaging a pin or socket. So the connector savers are sacrificial for when you test. They get mated to the real connections once at the beginning of your tests, and demated at the end. Then you give your real connections a thorough check at the physical level and hook them up.