| I currently work as an aircraft telemetry and instrumentation engineer, and have also done similar engineering on rockets. So I spend a lot of time thinking about (and have been trained very thoroughly about) connections and how to do them. > Hey, that's how you're supposed to use heatshrink! Wow, I've been doing it wrong for years. Out of curiosity, how have you been doing it? The way shown in this manual is the standard way to do it in my world. > Mildly surprised that they don't want crimped connections soldered I'm confused as to why you would think about soldering a crimped connection. Properly crimped connections will stand up to a good deal more vibration (and are pretty much gas-tight, staving off corrosion) than soldered connections. Plus, crimping is quick and easy with the right tools. Maybe there are some niche applications where you'd do both. I've never seen it. > Wow, had never heard of "connector saver" jumpers before. Sounds bananas Totally not bananas when you look at the spec sheet for something like a D38999 series connector. Connector savers are a normal thing in the aerospace world. Most connectors are only rated for a few hundred mate/demate cycles (Usually 250 or 500). Every time you mate or de-mate a connector you run the risk of damaging a pin or socket. So the connector savers are sacrificial for when you test. They get mated to the real connections once at the beginning of your tests, and demated at the end. Then you give your real connections a thorough check at the physical level and hook them up. |
Because most crimped connections (at least in the hobbyist/DIY world) are crap. So after crimping, the only way they hold together is with solder.
There are no applications where this is better. Every connector manufacturer I know recommends against doing it. You can get away with doing it if you support the soldered end against vibration, but you should do that anyway.
It's really a training issue. People haven't been taught better and there is a lot of bad advice floating around hobbyist forums. I have only been using good crimping tools for the last few years since I started making a product with a 50-conductor harness. Until I spent $200 on a crimping tool and took the time to research how to make good crimps (Molex has an excellent document), I never realized how they were supposed to look. Now most of my tools are used, purchased at auctions of dead companies, but I have $400 crimping tools I paid pennies on the dollar for. Even so, I normally farm out crimping to a company that does it with automated machinery, better and faster than I can do by hand.