[thunky]

You're evading my questions...

> No, being the boss is your superpower

Ok so how exactly do I do this? That's what I'm asking. I'm trying to get your concrete recommendation here. What does "be the boss" mean? How do I actually do it?

Here's why I ask:

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

Over half the country doesn't know what you know: they don't know how to use their superpower. So what are they missing?

[win311fwg]

> trump-approval-tracker

Keep in mind that Trump was hired by the slate of electors you chose to hire. You did not choose him yourself. While ultimately all employees in your business are your responsibility, it is best for you to focus on the high ranking individuals, not the low-rung peons that are doing the busywork. First step is to call up the middle manager electors you hired directly and ask "What the hell?" They can worry about pushing things forward after that. Your role is to lead, not do everything.

In addition, you also directly hired a representative and a senator, tasked with keeping the rank and file employee in line. If they are not doing that, you also need to call them up and ask "What the hell?" If the phone is not your thing, visit their office. You are paying good money as their employer to give them an office. Don't be afraid to step foot in it. Your company directory gives the office location and phone number, in case your memory happens to be short and you've forgotten how to contact the person you hired already.

From there, it is a case by case basis. Every employee is going to have their own quirks and you have to learn how to work with them. But, I mean, they're just regular humans. You treat them like you would any other employee. If you owned a McDonalds location, you'd have to deal with imperfect humans just the same. This is no different.

If all this still is beyond your grasp, community colleges typically have management courses you can enrol in. Jumping straight in and doing it is usually the best way to learn, however. You might look like a fool the first time you engage with your employees, but who cares? By next year you'll be a seasoned pro. Best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, but the second best time is now.

[thunky]

> If all this still is beyond your grasp, community colleges typically have management courses you can enrol in

You're taking this analogy too far. Managing an employee is not like electing a representative. We're not describing a boss-employee relationship here.

This motivational talk of "you have a superpower" and "you're the boss" all boiled down to one piece of concrete advice you gave: "call your representative". You've not given me anything else I can do with my high level management skills.

I admire your optimism, but I think we have enough evidence at this point to know that this is just not going to do it.

[win311fwg]

> Managing an employee is not like electing a representative. We're not describing a boss-employee relationship here.

Quite literally we are. I know it may not feel like it if you are accustomed to sitting back and letting the world crumble around you, but you are electing someone to work for you. What would the voting process be for if you didn't need anyone to do your bidding? Most importantly, why are you putting the elected on the payroll if you don't need them to work for you? Were you under the impression that they work for free?

> I think we have enough evidence at this point to know that this is just not going to do it.

If you don't like being called the boss, there's another word we use to describe participating in democracy: Lobbying. I think we can reasonably conclude that it does work because those who push a dictatorial agenda always cry about how the lobbyists (i.e. those who take time to talk to the workers) actually get things done — just not the things they imagine would get done if there was one all knowing, all powerful supreme dictator. Plus we know it works because we can see it in every other walk of life. The people don't become space aliens when the word government is thrown into the mix. People are people are people.

I get this desire for magic, but magic doesn't exist.

[thunky]

> there's another word we use to describe participating in democracy: Lobbying

And there's another word we can use to describe Lobbying: Bribery.

Lobbying is a (corrupt) industry and I'm not a participant in it, so unfortunately I'm still down to "call your representative".

The system really doesn't work as you say. Representatives don't respond to what their constituents want. They respond to money and and power. That's not democracy.

[win311fwg]

> I'm still down to "call your representative".

Which is literally lobbying, which you refuse to participate in, so that leaves accepting that all your great thoughts will be forever stuck in your head. The person you hired to work with your thoughts is most definitely not a mind reader.

> They respond to money and and power.

Money and power is not some fundamental property of the universe. It is only social. It is given to whom the people want to give it to. So, if the money and power isn't directed where you want to see it, give money and power to someone else.

> That's not democracy.

Right. Democracy takes place when you make yourself heard, by actually talking to people, not computers, about what you feel needs to be heard, while holding the representatives accountable if they do not do their job. So far you appear to be doing neither. If democracy isn't your thing, that's fine. The neat thing about democracy is if you don't like it and choose not to participate, it naturally turns into the only alternative, so everyone wins — except those who cling to the idea of magic. Unfortunately, magic doesn't exist.

[thunky]

> Which is literally lobbying, which you refuse to participate in, so that leaves accepting that all your great thoughts will be forever stuck in your head

It's literally not possible to fix a corrupt system by asking a participant in it to change the system that benefits them.

> Unfortunately, magic doesn't exist.

You are under the illusion that we operate under a functional democracy that responds to the will of the people. It's you that believes in magic, not me.