[wseqyrku]

I feel there's a clear alternative to the problem presented. I do not expect Empty to match any of those interfaces. A generic method should only match with a generic method of the same arity.

[int_19h]

This has nothing to do with arity?

[remexre]

arity as in "number of generic arguments," I think they meant.

[int_19h]

Still confused then, because there are two sets of generic arguments at play, and a proper call would match the arity of both.

[wseqyrku]

Yeah, it would be that plus the name and the signature as per usual. I don't think this is a huge limitation considering the alternative they chose: disallow generic methods altogether.

[int_19h]

So how would you implement generic method calls via an interface reference?

[VirusNewbie]

The same way the other languages do it.