Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by int_19h 450 days ago
This has nothing to do with arity?
1 comments

arity as in "number of generic arguments," I think they meant.
Still confused then, because there are two sets of generic arguments at play, and a proper call would match the arity of both.
Yeah, it would be that plus the name and the signature as per usual. I don't think this is a huge limitation considering the alternative they chose: disallow generic methods altogether.
So how would you implement generic method calls via an interface reference?
The same way the other languages do it.
Isn't that way either JIT or boxed integers?