Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by remexre 450 days ago
arity as in "number of generic arguments," I think they meant.
1 comments

Still confused then, because there are two sets of generic arguments at play, and a proper call would match the arity of both.
Yeah, it would be that plus the name and the signature as per usual. I don't think this is a huge limitation considering the alternative they chose: disallow generic methods altogether.
So how would you implement generic method calls via an interface reference?
The same way the other languages do it.
Isn't that way either JIT or boxed integers?