[thechao]

> Oh, they won't fare well in a collision with F-150? Then maybe we can remove those from the streets outside specific delivery and maintenance hours, and impose a lower speed limit for heavier cars.

A few things:

1. We should tax vehicles according to their road damage, i.e., O((weight/axles)^4*axles);

2. Vehicles with bumpers/hoods higher than Xcm should never be allowed in the left lane;

3. Vehicles with gas mileage worse than 3g/100miles shouldn't be allowed to go over 45mph.

My neighbors almost universally run small businesses; and, almost universally, slap their business sticker on their 100k$+ 250s & 350s and then take the whole cost as a "write off" for "tax purposes". If the IRS was doing their jobs, these fuckers wouldn't be on the road — they'd be paying off fines and/or in prison for fraud.

[Dalewyn]

>1. We should tax vehicles according to their road damage, i.e., O((weight/axles)^4*axles);

Fair, though keep in mind that EVs and specifically their batteries are damn heavy putting them as sedans right up there with the bigger pickups and SUVs.

Taxes on EVs will also have to compensate for fuel taxes that would not apply to them.

>2. Vehicles with bumpers/hoods higher than Xcm should never be allowed in the left lane;

Here in America we deal in freedom units, not metric.

Also, Americans love their RVs and big muscle trucks (both pickups and 18 wheelers).

>3. Vehicles with gas mileage worse than 3g/100miles shouldn't be allowed to go over 45mph.

Hope you'll like your groceries and all other shopping becoming quite a bit more expensive to make up for slower transport. 18 wheelers are the life blood of the American economy.

>slap their business sticker on their 100k$+ 250s & 350s and then take the whole cost as a "write off" for "tax purposes".

What they are doing is buying the vehicle using company funds as company equipment and then writing it down as a loss on their Income/Loss sheet. There's nothing wrong with it and you should do so for any company purchases.

You might complain that the line between personal and commercial is being blurred and you would be right, but in the small business world that line is blurry for both practical and "less than justifiable but tolerated" reasons.

Obligatory disclaimer: I'm not a CPA, none of this should be understood as financial advice. Consult a proper CPA or financial advisor for financial advice.

[gruez]

>What they are doing is buying the vehicle using company funds as company equipment and then writing it down as a loss on their Income/Loss sheet. There's nothing wrong with it and you should do so for any company purchases.

I think the "fraud" comes from the fact that they use it for personal purposes but fail to declare it on their income tax returns as they should[1]. For the typical case of a general contractor or an electrician using their "work" pickup truck to buy groceries or even to commute, that expense is not tax-deductible and must be declared as a fringe benefit.

[1] https://www.irs.gov/publications/p15b#en_US_2024_publink1000...

[_heimdall]

I believe the argument is generally that they are advertising for the business whenever driving a company vehicle with logos on it.

As the GP said, the line is very unclear for small businesses. It isn't technically fraud, though, if our current laws allow it. Fight to change the laws if you want to, but until then it can't be fraud.

[gruez]

>I believe the argument is generally that they are advertising for the business whenever driving a company vehicle with logos on it.

The linked IRS document specifically says

>For example, a pickup truck qualifies if it is clearly marked with permanently affixed decals, special painting, or other advertising associated with your trade, business, or function and meets either of the following requirements.

(emphasis mine)

[gruez]

>2. Vehicles with bumpers/hoods higher than Xcm should never be allowed in the left lane;

Why the left lane? Isn't the right lane closer to pedestrians? Also, what if you need to do a left turn?

>3. Vehicles with gas mileage worse than 3g/100miles shouldn't be allowed to go over 45mph.

seems like a nightmare to enforce, especially for models with hybrid variants that could do 3g/100mi.

[Dylan16807]

> seems like a nightmare to enforce, especially for models with hybrid variants that could do 3g/100mi.

They can get a different color on the license plate. Easiest fine in the world.

[tmoertel]

> 2. Vehicles with bumpers/hoods higher than Xcm should never be allowed in the left lane;

How does this edict apply to roads on which each direction has only one lane (accounting for about half of US traffic volume)?

[romwell]

Takes notes

Those ideas read like poetry.

[8jef]

Good grief, you're my hero! But seriously, that kind of talk could get you elected.

[warkdarrior]

Elected maybe in California, but not most of the US and definitely not in Texas, Florida, etc.

[kelseyfrog]

In Texas and Florida big trucks are gender-affirming vehicles for cis-people. That's the nature of reality, big toys for big boys.

[qwerpy]

Cis person who drives a big truck in Washington state, don’t leave us out! To be fair it’s a cybertruck so I’m not sure how gender affirming it is. The manly gas guzzling truck drivers don’t seem to approve.