|
|
|
|
|
by dannyw
780 days ago
|
|
You're recording a podcast and want to tweak some of your own words, without the hassle of re-recording. You're an indie game developer, and want to have vibrant NPCs with their unique voices and dialogues powered by a LLM. You're producing a movie, and want to tweak certain lines of dialogue; with the consent of the talent. You suffer from health conditions and are gradually losing your voice, but you still want to communicate. There are certainly legitimate use cases of this technology. I personally believe illegitimate use cases overshadow the legitimate use cases, but I don't think it's fair to say there are no legitimate applications. We should strictly regulate the use of this technology by criminalizing abuse; not by banning it altogether (which is pretty hard in the case of software and small models). |
|
The latest agreement to end the last round of strikes was to prevent this very thing.
Of your list, the medical condition to give someone their real voice instead of a Hawking voice would be the most legit reason. Everything else is a skewed sense of morally acceptable as I think they are shady