[BenoitP]

> But since the splats aren't a surface, they don't exactly have a "behind".

Spherical Harmonics apply to the whole sphere, splats can learn a SH color for their "behind". But by definition there is no data for these (no camera to tell what the color is). Nothing is preventing current pipelines to define that the opposite direction (splat looking at the camera) has a special color (black, zero-alpha, blend of blurred splats between camera and splat, etc); or to regularize all splats so that there is some amount of an "undefined" transparent component to be applied where camera won't define the SH.

[vanderZwan]

> Nothing is preventing current pipelines to define that the opposite direction (splat looking at the camera) has a special color (black, zero-alpha, blend of blurred splats between camera and splat, etc)

Wouldn't you need to know that there is no other camera view from the opposite direction? (sorry if dumb question, haven't actually looked at how GS are generated from input data)

[contravariant]

I can't be considered an expert either, but from what I understand they're currently using spherical harmonics (or some others set of basis functions) to model how a surface emits light from various directions.

However in most cases this will simply cut off as soon as you view a surface from the other side, so it kind of makes sense to add some special handling for that scenario. Especially since it can be hard to properly fit a discontinuity like that.

As it currently stands I imagine the reflection trick would be unable to work if you had a camera view from the other side, which is not ideal.

[vanderZwan]

Oh right, because if we're looking at (say) a ball from two sides, we're not looking at the same splat. So except for very thin 1D-approximating shapes like the spokes of a bike wheel, or pointy convex shapes, most splats will effectively be domes, right?