[bsenftner]

As GenX myself, this resonates. How the generation directly after us embraces the literal opposite of our core values is an astonishing example of human nature.

What this essay severely lacks is the recognition that directly between GexX coming of age and these influencers is the dawn of hip hop and the recognition within hip hop that "refusing to sell out" is a suckers game and "getting paid" is everything. Hip hop fully embraces that perspective, and our influencer generation had the dawning of mainstream hip hop during their childhoods just as that message was omnipresent in hip hop.

[shanebellone]

You don't understand hip-hop nor its history.

[bartvk]

Your comment comes across as rude (to me at least), since you don't explain why OP doesn't understand it, or what they miss about hip-hop or its history.

[michaelt]

While nobody in hiphop was ever so committed to the truth that somebody rapping about dealing drugs could be convicted on the basis of their lyrics, there's a long history of rappers policing each other's authenticity in terms of things like claiming to be a gang member when they weren't; and authenticity to the art form, in terms of not moderating lyrics in search of radio airplay and commercial appeal.

Of course, these matters are complicated because there are other dynamics at work too. There are some fairly nuanced distinctions - a lot of gangster rappers didn't see Will Smith's family-friendly rap as selling out because he'd never claimed to be a gangster. Among rappers a less well known performer can gain a lot of publicity from starting a feud with someone well known, so some of the criticism has mixed motives (accusing the successful of selling out is a classic choice). And if you believe all financial success is inherently inauthentic, hiphop's bragging and bling celebrating financial success might seem like an embrace of inauthenticity - but I think most such performers would say they were poor and they're now rich and that's the reality they're authentically representing.

However, it's certainly not true to say that hiphop has wholeheartedly embraces selling out, or did so from the start.

[bsenftner]

Of course hip hop does not embrace selling out, it condemns the culture using "sell out" as a weapon against artists.

As Randall Kennedy writes in Sellout: ‘The Politics of Racial Betrayal‘, ‘When used in a racial context among African Americans, “sellout” is a disparaging term that refers to blacks who knowingly or with gross negligence act against the interest of blacks as a whole’ (2008: 5). For rap artists, commercial success or brand partnerships are not necessarily subject to accusations of selling out, as long as artists don’t use their newfound wealth to abandon the communities that nurtured them. https://www.thestateofthearts.co.uk/features/the-story-of-se...

[shanebellone]

Every statement made is incorrect or inaccurate.

The OP conflates the genesis of hip-hop with its commercialization. For example, the dawn of hip-hop predates the "influence industry" by 30-40 years.

[bsenftner]

No shit, I am describing the childhood roots that enabled the 180 degree value shift from the generation before them.

The commercialization of hip hop is what transformed hip hop from a sub-culture into a market and mainstream force. A large part of that was hip hop's lyrics condemning the "no sell out" culture.

[bsenftner]

Look into the commercial roots of hop hop. What I am saying is documented, with formal research. Serious.

https://www.thestateofthearts.co.uk/features/the-story-of-se...