|
|
|
|
|
by jareklupinski
1245 days ago
|
|
knowing it would cost that much ahead of time would let the purchaser and engineer work together to determine if it would be more cost-effective to swap that part out for a similarly specced but less expensive chip, or rework the circuit to use a slightly different chip, perhaps with two chips instead, or more jellybeans to make up the lost functionality a ten million dollar machine missing a 45 cent part probably costs a few hundred thousand to redesign around that part. a mass market vehicle that needs multiple of those part per SKU would be cheaper to re-engineer |
|
And now you have not one but 2-3 chips that are in demand and price rises for those too.
Also in case of cars and similar equipment there would be a bunch of re-testing required so that drives cost of reengineering hard.
Especially if said part was used as "jellybean" across a lot of modules just because it's cheaper to buy same part in bulk