[TinkersW]

Sweeney commented on twitter

"The aim is a transactional programming model with no visible networking or multithreading: you write normal code, and the system distributes the simulation across cores, servers, and servers by running updates speculatively, then committing or aborting them"

Seems vaguely similiar to how Unreal networking already works, but I guess more automatic.

Some parts of the game will perhaps have to run outside verse so they can be interpolated/smoothed, unless they have some magic to handle that also.

[cottenio]

There comes a point in any massively scaling networking project, and here I speak with some experience, when you realize that your goal, while admirable, has no bearing on the lessons learned over the last few decades of MMO development.

I fear this is a handwave.

What I mean by that is that its addressing the wrong problem for the Metaverse. Being able to implement an ECS model, for instance, where different platforms have common system requirements but because they're both built on Verse they can easily glom/reduce/map components and functions so entities in one ruleset can interact in the other... that's neat, but not a technology problem.

It's a combinatoric problem. And a game design problem.

By the time Verse is built up enough and has enough market penetration to try to take on this sort of role as a bedrock foundation layer for the Metaverse I think we're going to see two major shifts that make it obsolete:

1. The rise of AI-aided design and programming (think ChatGPT on steroids) that makes it pointless to worry about having One Great Solution when the AIs can just interop/translate and all the platforms (even competing corporate interests) can be "Metaversy" with their entities/players.

2. Either the combinatoric problem gets solved or it doesn't. Game designers have strong opinions on NFTs, for instance. The majority recognize them as incapable of solving the item portability problem (or as Raph Koster says, is it even desired?). Either novel ways emerge to do so and it's solvable, or they don't. I suspect either way the heavy lifting is not a programming technology problem, but a contractual/API one.

[morelisp]

Also speaking as someone with experience in MMO development: This is fucking wild to describe as a handwave, you think Epic / Tim Sweeney have the wrong end of the stick regarding distributed execution because... the AIs will solve it for us in the next few years?

> By the time Verse is built up enough and has enough market penetration...

Verse will already have a dominant market position the minute you can do something in Fortnite with it.

I'm much more interested to know what the top LSL programmers or Minecraft modders think of it, than the team working on Guild Wars 2 or whatever. That's who it's relevant for.

[cottenio]

You know, your comment made me rethink a few things.

I don't know if they have the wrong end of the stick. I'm afraid they might, because based on their presentations so far the Metaverse bit seems more tacked on than intrinsic. However, these are credentialed people well known in the field - it's hard to tell how much is exuberance re: Metaverse usage.

Regarding my comment on AI, I think it's relevant. It's not that AI will "solve all our problems", but that AI-aided design and code implementation will make learning a language like this obsolete. Transpilation will be seamless and backgroundy. So now there's a cost/benefit factor to learning a new language that was used to write a distributed execution layer for the Metaverse in a transaction-first manner, versus using tools that just "do it for us" and interact with the "product" created with Verse.

As far as Fortnite having a dominant market position once they do stuff with it, I'm not sure of that. I mean, StateScript being awesome doesn't make a dominant market position for it because of its use in Overwatch. I recognize the fundamental difference because the latter is closed and proprietary, sure, but I'm just not sure about the level of separation between Language and Product here when they're talking about the Metaverse. I look forward to learning more.

[morelisp]

> Fortnite having a dominant market position once they do stuff with it, I'm not sure of that. I mean, StateScript being awesome doesn't make a dominant market position for it because of its use in Overwatch. I recognize the fundamental difference because the latter is closed and proprietary, sure...

No, the fundamental difference is between Fornite and Overwatch, not between the languages. Fortnite has an order of magnitude more users and, more critically, is a freeform social gathering place in a way Overwatch is not.

Like honestly, I'm not sure you know what Fortnite is today, if you're comparing it with Overwatch. It's a competitor for VRChat and Minecraft as much as it is a Battle Royale game. This is going to make it a competitor for Roblox and Second Life too.

[cottenio]

Heh, that's pretty fair. When I saw my son running around as Naruto I also was no longer sure what Fortnite was =)