[enkid]

There are so many competitors for Twitter. Every social media platform is an alternative. Twitter's only moat is the network effect, and they are ruining any chance of that being maintained by making the experience awful, not moderating the platform and reinventing people who the majority of users don't want to hear from.

[indecisive_user]

Agree with the sibling comment.

Snapchat, TikTok, Hacker News, and LinkedIn are all social media sites. In the sense that you can only pay attention to one thing at a time, sure, these are competitors to Twitter.

But as far as actual content, value, or user experience, none of these are direct competitors. How exactly would the White House or your local school district go about making an announcement on TikTok?

[dangus]

It seems like the content, user experience, and value to the user are not necessarily relevant to the customer, who is the advertiser.

In that sense, I think all the other major social media platforms are direct competitors to Twitter, probably better ones at that considering how often Twitter content is shared around as screenshots and quotes instead of funneling users into data-collecting apps.

The advertisers just want to get their message in front of someone who is paying attention and fits their desired attributes.

[mlindner]

At least for me personally there aren't any real alternatives.

* Facebook/Meta: I'm a life long non-facebook user and never will use any facebook product.

* Reddit: I'm on Reddit and have been for a long time but moderators ban people on a whim constantly for the slightest disagreement. My primary account has been banned from several major subreddits for a long time. Any community that grows to any size becomes a cess pool. It also doesn't work for news, as news is delayed by up to a day before getting any kind of traction.

* Mastodon: Becoming a left wing echo chamber that mixes the worst parts of Reddit and the worst parts of Twitter.

* Truth Social: Don't get me started...

* Forums: I still use a number of site-dedicated forums.

[tchalla]

If you’re banned from multiple subReddits with diverse moderation teams , you may want to consider focus inwards rather than outwards.

[mlindner]

They're not diverse moderation teams. They're echo chambers. And they're over minor issues. And when I tried to protest I got permabanned.

[cesarvarela]

Sorry but that's not true, no network provides the same experience and dopamine flavor:

- twitch: parasocial/games - youtube: long videos/reviews - tiktok: short videos/random stuff/zoomers - facebook: friends/stalking/boomers ...

- twiter: microbloging/townhall/news

Totally different use cases with each having a clearly defined space (of course there is some overlap, it is all about human interaction after all).

[dangus]

How does that different user experience and format affect the customer? By customer, I mean advertiser.

Why does an advertiser go to Twitter over Meta or TikTok? That’s the real question to be asking.

I’d make the argument that the content format is very nearly irrelevant to the advertisers.

I can understand why an advertiser goes to Twitter instead of more defined niche ad platforms like Yelp, Google Maps, and iOS App Store.

What customer can be reached on Twitter that can’t be reached in Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok? In my mind, if advertisers are spooked by Twitter, they’ve got plenty of equivalent alternatives.

[kristintynski]

What’s to stop any of its current competitors from making a Twitter clone, one with moderation? If he can’t keep advertisers, Google or someone else could leverage their already existing network effects to take Twitter refugees.

[HWR_14]

> Google or someone else could leverage their already existing network effects

Google tried this taking on Facebook. It didn't work because network effects cannot force someone to a new network. Heck, it almost killed YouTube in the process of getting Google+ their network.