I see they are showing Bruce Willis as the artist that has agreed to have his digital twin be used in video production but a few days ago he denied it himself*
> Willis's agent told the BBC, "Please know that Bruce has no partnership or agreement with this Deepcake company."
A charitable assumption would be that Deepcake thought it found a contact with someone pretending to be Mr Willis’ agent, but that was an impostor.
Considering that the statement they think they got from Mr Willis has the same grammar approximations as the rest of the website, I find it unlikely it was actually from him.
I don't seem to understand the confusion here. Deepcake paid Bruce Willis for a one time project (that telecom ad).
The news then seemed to fabricate that he has signed off his likeness in some sort of long term contract. It was later established this wasn't the case, but that still doesn't mean he didn't engage in the previous work.
Yeah something weird is going on here. My first thought was that Willis has aphasia so maybe he forgot he signed away the rights. But I'm pretty sure the statement came from his rep. Unless they're blatantly ripping him off though they'd have to have permission even to use his likeness promotionally.
It isn't US based, so they are likely blatantly ripping it off with no permission to get eyes on their company. There are unlikely to be any legal ramifications.
The less likely possibility is that they did get rights, but look so shady that the rep can't confirm it is legitimate without a blow to credibility.
Hah, as I was reading Bruce Willis' statement on deepcake's site (that didn't seem like technical vocab a Hollywood actor would use) I was wondering "man, it would be too good if they just ripped off his likeness for this and he had nothing to do with it."
We have seen pretty much everything during the last years, so I can easily figure
a situation in which another company made a better deepfake and contacted Deepcake pretending to be the real Bruce Willis, so that they acquired the rights from a deepfake instead of the real actor.
A charitable assumption would be that Deepcake thought it found a contact with someone pretending to be Mr Willis’ agent, but that was an impostor.
Considering that the statement they think they got from Mr Willis has the same grammar approximations as the rest of the website, I find it unlikely it was actually from him.