I don't want to defend anyone, but at the same time, if I see accusations, I'd like to see substance and reference points, not just "they're scumbags", end of conversation.
Please, provide some details on why you think they're like that.
Not everything is a question of "does it collect data", actually.
They're collecting _some_ value from individuals, whether you understand it or not.
Your comment reminds me of Facebook's disingenuous "we we're not _selling_ the data", which just a way of distracting from the real issue. This isn't about data, it's about yet another incremental stripping down of individual's control over their intrinsics.
You seem to agree that they don't collect biometric data, so I'm not sure exactly what "intrinsics" is being "stripped down" from individuals, in this case. Could you clarify?
I don't agree to anything, because I don't know enough about it. They SAY they don't collect data, they SAY it's a zero knowledge proof. Who knows about that.
What I know is that they're extracting some value from people who (like me) likely don't understand the implications. This isn't complicated.
Especially because they could have done a basic search for what the person was talking about. Not everything needs to be cited if it’s an easy search away.
Agree with not just this comment but your comments as a new throwaway (I assume?) account in general. Though I don’t care about the CCP enough to be as anti CCP as you. Tho Ofc I am anti CCP
I don't want to defend anyone, but at the same time, if I see accusations, I'd like to see substance and reference points, not just "they're scumbags", end of conversation.
Please, provide some details on why you think they're like that.