Oh yeah, that is what you get when you submit your diagrams and invention specifications and API to a team of lawyers :)
If you search the word click, it takes you to meat and potatoes but very well said. I was quite furious with the lawyers at the time but they had to navigate existing prior art and ability to defend this in future.
If you think there's a legal issue, this, obviously, isn't the forum.
If you want to tell people "I had this idea first!" this also isn't the forum; you're either wrong, or are pointing to the wrong thing (patents aren't particular readable or understandable); show us the thing you made.
Because I am excited that this idea got turned into a viable product. And what is wrong with sharing the excitement with my fellow nerds including the fact that I had this idea first? It is all about execution and kudos to stripe for taking this idea forward and turning into a viable product.
Then perhaps a comment along the lines of "This is really neat! I'm so glad to see someone else doing this; I originally patented something akin to it and then (never used it/did and here's the thing I built), and it's awesome to see continued development in this area".
As it is, it's not clear what your intent is (hence my question). You aren't congratulating them. You aren't expressing excitement. To your credit, you also aren't claiming they're infringing, though it begins to approach it.
Did you look at the patent? Did you understand it? Do you have the legal knowledge to both understand if the patent is valid (since plenty have been overturned in the past), and that this in fact violates it?
If not yes to all of those, the comment hasn't helped illuminate you in any way.
Not a lawyer but you didn't patent this. A patent only covers what's described in its claims, and looking at Claim 1 (the only independent claim) there are lots of very specific features that would have to be present for your patent to cover this.
Even if one of these stripe payment links is posted to a public social media channel, presumably neither the person doing the posting or stripe is going to do this because there's no association between the social media channel and the checkout page that stripe creates:
> conducting, by the processor, predictive modeling using the activity information, purchasing likelihood based on a number of visits by the user to the channel, past purchases by the user, and demographic information of the user;
Even if stripe was doing everything else in Claim 1 of your patent, just not doing this one thing means they aren't infringing your patent. (Again, not a lawyer, so don't listen to me).
Also, I may be wrong about this, but I suspect that the way you are using "processor" in your claims actually makes your patent 100% worthless, because it's describing both actions that would take place on the client side and on the server, so it will literally never be the case that the same processor is going to perform all of these steps even if they were all occuring in some implementation.