[resoluteteeth]

Not a lawyer but you didn't patent this. A patent only covers what's described in its claims, and looking at Claim 1 (the only independent claim) there are lots of very specific features that would have to be present for your patent to cover this.

Even if one of these stripe payment links is posted to a public social media channel, presumably neither the person doing the posting or stripe is going to do this because there's no association between the social media channel and the checkout page that stripe creates:

> conducting, by the processor, predictive modeling using the activity information, purchasing likelihood based on a number of visits by the user to the channel, past purchases by the user, and demographic information of the user;

Even if stripe was doing everything else in Claim 1 of your patent, just not doing this one thing means they aren't infringing your patent. (Again, not a lawyer, so don't listen to me).

Also, I may be wrong about this, but I suspect that the way you are using "processor" in your claims actually makes your patent 100% worthless, because it's describing both actions that would take place on the client side and on the server, so it will literally never be the case that the same processor is going to perform all of these steps even if they were all occuring in some implementation.