Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fgkramer 2089 days ago
Well, in their defence, you can't really know how much the uptime is going to be affected by until the incident is resolved. If it was a live counter then you'd see the uptime go up as the month progresses!
2 comments

I don't have a problem with it if they update the uptime stats afterwards, but why couldn't it be implemented "live"?

Basically time "down" / total time elapsed during $period. At the beginning of the month/quarter/period you'd be at 100% (if they are up at that moment). Or even simpler, just have it be a measurement of a rolling window X days in the past.

Because then the metrics can't be reviewed/vetoed by executives before being published. Optics > accuracy for most organizations, sadly.
Unfortunately true. About a year ago, I had reported a pod-specific issue to Zendesk (I'm fuzzy on the details). They confirmed the issue but also acknowledged that it would not reflect on status.zendesk.com.

I've questioned status pages since.

Just compute live uptime for the portion of the month that has elapsed thus far…