Also, "properly nourished" is a weasel phrase here. You see the exact same phenomenon among the U.S.-raised kids of Bangladeshis/Indians/Pakistanis from very comfortable families. The kids are way taller than parents who did not suffer any malnourishment back home. Just because it is theoretically possible to construct a vegan diet that results in the same growth as a diet including meat and dairy doesn't mean it's easy to do so with the kinds of foods readily available in the developing world.
First, you originally claimed meat as a factor (apparently still after an edit). Second, a vegetarian can eat dairy products. Finally, the only working link above is pretty much worthless (122 participants who were asked questions, measured, and checked again in 3 years) as it does not capture final adult height.
>Also, "properly nourished" is a weasel phrase here.
For sure, just like debating about meat consumption and pivoting to just dairy consumption as proof...
You need to remove the semi-colons from the link above. Three different studies showing that milk consumption results in taller children.
As to your second point--the issue under debate here is not meat consumption, but rather the CO2 emissions of animal agriculture. So we're talking about telling Bangladeshis to be vegans, not merely vegetarians.
Huh, these numbers really disagree in a couple places.
Nevertheless it seems like the most important way to minimize CO2 is to focus on grains, and that milk, eggs, poultry, pork, and fish aren't all that bad compared to the average vegetable.
And milk's easy to budget for, two cups a day is only 10% of a kid's calories.
Taller is not necessarily healthier. Cows milk is designed to bring a cow to adult size in one year. It has a very different composition than human milk. There is a lot of evidence that feeding that kind of rocket fuel for growth to humans has some serious downsides. Drinking milk in teenage years, for example, raises the risk of prostate cancer by 300% later in life.
It is, however, closely linked to status, especially in the developing world. Telling Bangladeshis they shouldn’t eat meat because Westerners blew the global CO2 budget is... problematic.
I don’t have the source for the 300 figure at hand now. I’ll try to find it again. Here’s a video review with links to sources that goes a lot deeper into the issues.
>Also, "properly nourished" is a weasel phrase here.
For sure, just like debating about meat consumption and pivoting to just dairy consumption as proof...