|
|
|
|
|
by danjoc
3276 days ago
|
|
>the entire scientific Python stack was essentially relying upon on the “free time” work of only about 30 people—and no one had funding! 30 people? I remember a time when a certain fruit company would enter a field, literally hire all 30 of those guys, and put them behind closed doors. Then in 2 years they'd dominate the field for the next decade. Are these guys turning down offers? Or is the fruit company that poorly managed now? |
|
And almost by definition, "those 30 guys" building and maintaining a library with their volunteer labor in some "field" (that didn't exist as such until relatively recently) mostly won't have standard-looking career paths.
Sometimes there is a critical mass of those folks concentrated in a company, prompting an acquihire.