[ethanbond]

Important point: while costing to the customer the same, if not more. The result? Uber operating at huge losses. The result of that? Well, austerity measures. You can already see the signs of Uber starting to clamp down and make their service worse and worse.

Recommended pickup locations -> No longer door to door?

Assigning next rides before the previous one has completed -> No longer "feeling like a baller" while your driver is fielding calls from other customers with you still in the car

Wait times have been getting demonstrably worse all over Manhattan, probably elsewhere too

General quality of car/driver has been in decline since Uber started, in part precisely because of their putting cabs out of business. What's your cab driver going to do when he decides it's not worth driving a cab anymore because of Uber? Duh, work for Uber.

There's no comparison right now, but there will be soon.

I'm never going to use Uber again except for business travel due to their nice tie-in with business accounts. Personal travel? Nope. In NYC I use Juno and elsewhere I'll use Lyft, Hailo, or any number of local alternatives.

[CPLX]

I agree, Uber drivers seem to be getting progressively more clueless and inexperienced. Last night I had one that would just stare at the moving map on the GPS, without any situational awareness at all, up to the point where we were down to about 15mph on an interstate highway while he tried to figure out which of the tangle of exit ramps it wanted him to take, which was wildly unsafe. It did occur to me that for all the frustration cab drivers engendered, they did actually like know how to get from the major airport to the major train station without getting confused and stopping in the middle of the highway.

That is what it is, but the larger point I think it inspires, as does your post, is that I can't see how Uber can possibly claim that it's going to be able to generate some kind of monopoly profits from the whole endeavor.

Theoretically the whole point of all this insane fundraising and spending is that Uber will, one day, be in some dominant and unassailable position, and can raise prices. But that doesn't make any sense, they're increasingly making it clear that they have a commodity product at best. How they plan to defend that as a monopoly is a mystery.

And let's talk about self driving cars when there's at least one single car somewhere in the world that actually can drive itself somewhere without a driver present. Until that day, which is likely in the semi-distant future, we're talking about the economics and practical effects of an app based car and driver hailing service.

And lastly, it's probably worth noting the parent commenter posting multiple times in this thread defending the company actually works for Uber, and has a HN posting history almost entirely composed of defending the companies who pay him: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonbarone

[bananabill]

I've been noticing that too. When I was trying to go to Github Universe the cab driver ended up taking a call from his kid's daycare, meanwhile driving me to the wrong pier, stopping at a power station and asking if this was the right place.

Also, every uber driver I had when visiting virginia would ask me how to get where I wanted to go. I would have to tell them that I have no idea, and then we'd get lost.

I guess I assume that these drivers would eventually get weeded out thanks to the rating system, but since the system isn't anonymous, I think most people rate 5 stars no matter what.

[xapata]

> isn't anonymous

They don't know who rated them what. All they know is their average over the last 500 riders.

[ceras]

Counter-anecdote: I've had an NYC cab driver stop in the middle of the interstate trying to figure out which way to go next to JFK. It was pretty scary. The driver quality in both services seems very low to me.

[potatolicious]

Agree. The UberX experience is just getting worse and worse over time in NYC - won't be long before it gets to yellow cab levels, if not worse.

UberBlack is fine as always, you get what you pay for.

Drivers are getting consistently worse - both in knowledge of streets and in general behavior. I'm a bit sympathetic - they're getting squeezed hard by Uber and the system can be draconian - but the reality is that I get more asshole behavior from UberX drivers nowadays than I do from yellow cabs, which are at least consistent in their mediocrity.

I feel like UberX is going to go down as a brief, glimmering moment when ridehailing was cheap and good, before economic reality picked one of the above, not both.

[Hydraulix989]

UberX is becoming UberLateModelPrius here in SF

[potatolicious]

I'm less concerned about it being UberLateModelPrius (a not-fancy car was always part of the deal with X), but I've noticed last time in SF it was becoming UberFilthyLateModelPriusWithRudeDriver. That I do mind.

They're becoming just like the cabs they replaced, just without the brightly colored paint jobs.

[ethanbond]

And insurance policies + regulations (even if said regulations go unenforced more than they should).

[xapata]

AFAIK many states require (and Uber provides) commercial insurance while a rider is in the car.

[pjc50]

What happened to the legendary driver ratings system enforcing politeness?

[TeMPOraL]

High turnover would be my guess. The rude driver you see is on his way out, only to be quickly replaced by another one.

[hx87]

I wonder if it would be possible (and legal) to use machine learning algorithms to determine which driver applicants are likely to have low ratings.

[jasonbarone]

Fair points but let me add a few things to consider as well:

"Uber operating at huge losses... service worse and worse." I don't agree here, the service is much better than before. Even with the introduction of uberpool, the service has stayed nearly the same for me in NY, and especially here in SF, while the cost has cut over 50% or more. If you follow Uber closely you can see they're investing into the company to continue to grow. You can see them experimenting with new products and services. UberEATS [1] (leveraging the same tech and driver network), San Francisco flat rate subscriptions [2], and self-driving cars [3]. Lyft and other competitors are followers at this point and are trying to compete by burning capital on huge ad-buys. Uber is significantly ahead.

"No longer door to door." This is to better connect both parties in the pickup and drop off. I've been using this non-stop in SF, it's more efficient and safe for the rider. It's also safer for the driver and helps them avoid getting tickets that ruin a driver's week.

"Feeling like a baller." There are still other products for these if you want privacy and better service. If your driver isn't giving you the expected service you can rate them accordingly.

"General quality has been declining." This shouldn't be the case. Uber has strict vehicle requirements in all cities that drivers must follow. Uber also connect drivers to fleet partners, rental partners and new and pre-owned vehicles during the signup process. If anything, the cars will get even better as they deprecate older models.

"What's your cab driver going to do...?" He will work for Uber, but again he will follow Uber's vehicle requirements.

1. http://eats.uber.com

2. https://www.uber.com/info/plus/sanfrancisco

3. https://newsroom.uber.com/pittsburgh-self-driving-uber

[sdenton4]

Uber is only ahead if those side bets, like Eats, actually pay off.

Also worth asking: Are the price reductions you've seen real, or the result of burning dumpsters of cash in the price war with Lyft?

[ThomPete]

Uber just have to survive until self-driving cars are a reality.

[mden]

So maybe another decade or two? I'm not sure a 'just' is fair when aiming for something never done before.

[ThomPete]

I don't believe it will take that long.

[vkou]

Solving the self-driving car problem in busy urban centers is vastly more difficult then solving it for freeway driving. (Where this technology still manages to fail in a very spectacular way.)

[ThomPete]

You mean like here:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BK0z7oZgOia7zfdlJ4ygJqEDBW8e17lq...

[vkou]

What is that supposed to prove? It's a test vehicle. It's being driven by a human. There's no roadmap, there's nothing that's passed certification, there's no roadmap for when there will be something that passes certification.

[ethanbond]

Never mind solving the self-driving car problem in the thousands of legislatures throughout the US alone.

[vkou]

I think if it can be solved in California, Texas, and at the federal level, the rest will follow suit.

Self-driving taxi legislature, on the other hand, will be a different can of worms.

In our current economic system, no city in its right mind will be interested in seeing robots funnel money directly from its residents to a VC fund.

[AlwaysRock]

Just noticed my uber in Chicago this weekend was roughly $2.50 more than normal. (I take the same uber ride every weekend) I'm not sure if prices have gone up but it is frustrating.

[ihsw]

Not parent commenter but I'll still take that over filthy cabs and sketchy-as-hell drivers.

[ethanbond]

You must've missed my point. I would too. However,

> There's no comparison right now, but there will be soon.

The things that I just listed are the things that are already happening, and their VCs haven't even started demanding their money back. And this is all if everything goes swimmingly for them. No massive regulatory hits, no demands for insurance, no declaration that drivers are employees, etc.

[hx87]

I'll hold the criticism until Uber drivers start using short wheelbase Camrys with vinyl seats and dividers (resulting in no legroom at all).

[dajohnson89]

For some reason I feel safer and more comfortable with Taxi drivers than with Uber drivers. I understand the whole background check thing, and that helps. But a taxi driver, whether you like it or not, is a full-time professional. Whereas an Uber driver is just somebody with a gig on the side (usually).

Taxi drivers less frequently ask me overly personal questions. Taxi drivers in general don't seem to give a fuck about their customers, and I've come to appreciate that. When I'm hailing a ride, chances are I'm not interested in exchanging life stories, or being impressed by how cool my driver is.

In a crowded city, the distance is welcome.

edit: one more thing -- Taxi drivers invariably know the roads better. Sometimes that doesn't matter. But in the event of traffic problems, or if you're really in a rush, it helps tremendously.

[applecore]

Uber is profitable in New York.

[ethanbond]

Oh good. They oughta be handling those billion dollar 6 month losses just fine then.

Reinvesting in owning a market that is literally an app install away from someone else stealing your lunch is not reinvesting. That's just burning cash.

[JoeAltmaier]

Its not about the app. Its about the Uber lawyers gaining entrance into local markets across the world. That's where the money is going.

[ethanbond]

It's about Uber's very expensive lawyers clearing the regulatory path for competitors (who are only app installs away) to then utilize for free from here until the heat death of the universe?

Clever strategy.

[xapata]

You seem to think it's easy for customers to switch. I think there's enough barrier that they can keep the network intact.

[ethanbond]

What are you talking about? I have like 4 ridesharing apps on my phone concurrently and switch between them based on whoever has the lowest time-until-pickup.

What barrier do you think is there?

[solutionyogi]

>>> Recommended pickup locations -> No longer door to door? Assigning next rides before the previous one has completed -> No longer "feeling like a baller" while your driver is fielding calls from other customers with you still in the car

Above is applicable only if you use UberPool. It's a great way to save money.

[ethanbond]

Nope. I've had one of the above (or both) happen for all 5 of my most recent Manhattan UberX rides.

To be clear, I'm not talking about someone joining your UberPool ride. I'm cool with that, I chose Pool after all. I'm talking about how now, Uber will assign your current driver to his next rider before your ride has ended. As in, he will drop you off and he will already have been assigned the next rider to pick up.

I like the optimization, I don't like the fact that then the next rider will start calling the driver asking where he is/why he's going this direction/why he's taking so long etc.

[Guest98123]

I had something similar happen with my last UberX ride. The app said the driver was a couple of hundred meters away on the map, so I rushed outside. Then, I watched him drive circles on the map around my location for 10 minutes. I thought he couldn't find the entrance. When I'd see him on the map going around the block to the opposite side of my building, I'd walk to the other entrance hoping to meet him. Then, he'd drive past on the map, and I'd return to the other entrance. When he finally arrived, I asked if he had trouble finding the location, but he said the last person he dropped off was lost, that's why it took so long. So, it's clear he had another passenger when Uber matched us up, and Uber showed his location on the map when he was still driving the other passenger. That caused a 10 minute delay on my end.

Then, when I was approaching my destination, some other people on the sidewalk were looking at their phone, and signaled to the driver. The driver pulled over next to them, I got out, the other people looked slightly confused someone was getting out of their Uber, and they got in.

[febbered]

I live in Manhattan and use uber ~10 times weekly. I've never observed the behavior you describe with uberX, only uberPOOL.

The UI does show you if the driver is finishing a ride near you, but it doesn't tell you to meet him at their dropoff point. It also tries to recommend known "visible" pickup locations along the street where you're calling from, but you can always specify your own location.

Do either of these things sound like what you're thinking of...?

[ethanbond]

> The UI does show you if the driver is finishing a ride near you

Ever consider what that means on the opposite end? Let's say you're an inpatient person (not a rarity in Manhattan). What happens when you call your Uber driver? Shockingly, he must now answer a call with another rider in the car. Effectively: making the ride less safe, making the ride less personal, cutting off any conversation, cutting off last minute "drop off" instructions like "under this red sign on the left" and generally degrading the entire experience.

And yes it is currently a recommended pickup spot for UberX. Thus why I said "Recommended pickup locations." Do you think it will stay that way? Given all the aforementioned stressors on Uber's monetization strategy, I highly, highly doubt it.

[febbered]

All fair. Just pointing out that this:

> Recommended pickup locations -> No longer door to door?

is not currently true for uberX. If you're inferring that uber is headed that way, well, maybe. But it's not so presently.

[ethanbond]

No, UberX does give recommended pickup locations. It just did it to me two days ago in London and has done it several times in Manhattan. It doesn't force you to use them, but that's why I said it's a recommended location.

[theorique]

I like the optimization, I don't like the fact that then the next rider will start calling the driver asking where he is/why he's going this direction/why he's taking so long etc.

That's barely different from the usual experience where the driver is jabbering away in Kreyol or Punjabi on his headset while the customer is in the back seat trying to tune it out.