[slackstation]

The fold of The Dissolve has nothing to do with the acquisition of ViralNova other than one could make money and the other could not. It's nothing more than one selling brocolli on the street corner and one selling candy. ViralNova makes cheap, fast, sticky content that no one really cares about. The Dissolve made content that not enough people cared about. The real competitor to The Dissolve is the amateur. All over the web, there are dozens if not hundreds of opinions about popular culture made by amateurs for their own enjoyment and distributed for free. The Dissolve and places like it cannot convince enough people to just give their time and attention because the product that they produce, their opinions on popular culture aren't proving to be so different of such a better quality than the rest of the internet combined. A quick google search for any topic and especially a popular one will return litterally millions of options to choose from. That's what the Dissolve is competing with, not ViralNova or The New York Times or The New Yorker but, all of them and the army of amateurs giving their opinions for free to anyone who will listen. The Dissolve is not better than that to enough people that they could get advertising to support themselves. Pointing to ViralNova as a reason is smoke-screen; a cynical and myopic answer to a complex question. It's never been better to be a consumer, to be a reader of popular culture despite the loudly bemoaned death of large media outlets. Now, there are problems with long form journalism and it's impact on democracy but, opinions on movies, video games, music and all popular culture are flourishing despite the death of places like The Dissolve.

[shopinterest]

Based on this, then everyone is an expert now, all you need is an opinion and an URL. So a random 19 year old's opinion is as valuable as an expert? Practically, of course not, but your arguments is that online, it doesn't matter. Expert and non-expert are the same. If that is the case, then its not cynical to say lowbrow content (even fake content, e.g. Clickhole) will beat quality content in the long run. I would rather get my Movie review notes from knowledgeable people than from a random responder at Yahoo Answers or a random YouTube video grapher ranting about Avengers and Female Ghostbusters, but if you really believe amateur content beats anything else, and the primary survival metrics are advertising dollars and scale, then nothing will survive because nothing would scale. In the scenario you describe, what content scales? Whatever ends at FB?