Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ep103 4118 days ago
I really don't want to develop web code in a world where the only two popular browsers are one developed by and for Google, and one by and for Microsoft. But every time I come to a thread that mentions Firefox on this website, there are people claiming (usually wrongly) that it doesn't implement x, y, or z that someone else does. I really think the development community needs to wake up a bit, and start promoting FF internally, instead of just following the Google hype train.
1 comments

Actually there will be three Google, Microsoft and Apple.

Whilst it is better to have some competition there really does need to be an open alternative.

Doesn't Apple use Webkit, same as Google? Isn't that functionally the same, except for Google's optimizations?
No Google forked Webkit into Blink[1] about two years ago.

[1] http://www.chromium.org/blink

Not really anymore. Google forked part of WebKit to create Blink[1], and both Safari and Chrome have their own optimizations.

I'm not sure how close to each other these rendering engines are. I imagine they're still very very similar, but now that the fork has occurred, time will tell how divergent (or not) they become.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_(layout_engine)

Chrome no longer uses Webkit; it uses a fork called Blink. (Technically a fork of WebCore, the core of WebKit.) It's similar, but has diverged since the fork.
They actually forked WebKit and use Blink now, but they obviously still share a lot of the same code as the fork is relatively recent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_%28layout_engine%29

They forked webkit, actually, and use something called Blink.

Check this out for a good summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Even when they were using WebKit, it was never the same version, and they had patches. So there never was a unique WebKit rendering engine.