|
|
|
|
|
by calibwam
4205 days ago
|
|
I'm not saying they would be fine now, but once (10 years ago), that was what you had. And now we have 4-8 cores on our laptops, and 2-4 on our phones. Why shouldn't we have 64 cores in the future if we solve the programming problems, and can make them energy efficient? Just because 4 cores are fine now, doesn't mean we shouldn't try to increase that. |
|
No it wasn't. Multi-processor Intel based workstation have been available since the very early 90s. People have realized for a very long time that having 2-4 cores is useful.
I'm still not convinced that, given that I have X Watts to spend, that I'm not better off with 4 CPUs using X/4 Watts each rather than 64 cores using X/64 Watts each. But I'm willing to be proven wrong.