[dagw]

but once (10 years ago), that was what you had.

No it wasn't. Multi-processor Intel based workstation have been available since the very early 90s. People have realized for a very long time that having 2-4 cores is useful.

I'm still not convinced that, given that I have X Watts to spend, that I'm not better off with 4 CPUs using X/4 Watts each rather than 64 cores using X/64 Watts each. But I'm willing to be proven wrong.

[calibwam]

Really? Do you mean people chained together multiple processors, or that Intel produced something? For I can't find it and would be interested in reading about those old systems.

[fulafel]

Intel was relatively late to the game, their multiprocessor support started getting decent around the Pentium Pro. The Unix workstation vendors (Sun etc) had dual CPU workstations a while earlier, but mostly SMP was used in servers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARCstation_10

Feather in the hat for first multi-core CPU on single die goes to IBM and the Power4 in 2001, preceding Intel's attempt by ~4 years. (Trivia: IBM also sold a Power4 MCM with 4 Power4 chips in a single package).

(Yes some people managed to stitch together earlier x86 processors too with custom hardware, but it wasn't pretty or cheap or fast).

[tbyehl]

Sequent had proprietary multi-processor 386 systems. The Intel MultiProcessor Specification dates back to 1993. Most Pentium II chipsets supported dual processors, which drove pricing down enough for enthusiasts to build them for home use.

[dagw]

There where a handful of companies making 2-8 socket motherboards for 486 processors. I know Compaq and NCR were early in offering workstation based around those motherboard designs.