|
|
|
|
|
by josephlord
4353 days ago
|
|
Using the analogy of the books you are raising the price in the milliseconds between the customer clicking buy and packets of that request reaching ebay's servers and all after the user has seen your price and stock availability a second ago. I don't think this acceptable business practice, if you have seen a price and a stock you should be able to place the order and (unless another order that isn't front running has arrived first to deplete the stock) the order should be fulfilled even if you show a different price to the next visitor to the product page. I can sort of see that but I don't quite understand why there are different exchanges. I can't see the benefit except to those for whom it is an arbitrage opportunity. I would also expect there to be low cost systems by which you could place simultaneous orders on all exchanges (at the cost of a slight delay in the order starting to allow them all to be posted at the same time as the furthest one. The HFT still seems to add little real liquidity. The spreads that are shown may be narrower but the real spread seems much higher. |
|
Speed shouldn't be the factor for why this isn't acceptable. The seller doesn't know that there are orders in the queue for the eBay order, they're just raising the price. That they're doing it quickly is just a matter of efficiency.
> I can sort of see that but I don't quite understand why there are different exchanges.
Yeah. No idea there.
> I would also expect there to be low cost systems by which you could place simultaneous orders on all exchanges
There are.