|
|
|
|
|
by Mandatum
4367 days ago
|
|
I don't understand how a darkpool could exist without rogue HF traders bumping up the revenue from stock trades. If the current stock market won't allow for it, what makes them think a private market will? At the end of the day whoever operates the pool has to foot the bill if they're trading outside of the official exchange.. Unless they turn it into a Ponzi-type scenario or outright lie to their investors. |
|
That is, by only allowing similar market participants (think other hedge funds, pension funds, etc) and excluding "predatory" speculative market participants (HFT, day traders, pit traders, etc.) you can match "natural" trades to each other, without paying the middle man.
In reality, this never happens. Speculative "predatory" traders are a necessary component of the market and without them there isn't sufficient liquidity for the market to operate.
In this particular case, an ibank stands accused of lying about this fundamental fact to their clients. It has nothing to do with the underlying validity of the market structure.