|
|
|
|
|
by privong
4416 days ago
|
|
> This is an argument I see a lot - just think and you will realize how right I am. It is often used in place of an evidence-based argument and is an appeal TO your logical brain FROM someone's emotional brain. I think there's a lot of evidence that people don't respond to logic-based appeals as logically as one would hope. Often, confronted with strong evidence that contradicts people's deeply-held beliefes or feelings, they'll just double-down on those beliefs. Climate change is the most obvious example. While as a scientist I'm sympathetic to your argument, I think the jury is still out regarding the most effective way to go about convincing people to change their beliefs or behavior. EDIT: typos, reword for clarity |
|
[0] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/antivaccination-pa...
[1] (PDF) http://web.archive.org/web/20110511211719/http://www-persona...