[maggit]

I get incredible value out of Stack Overflow. Do you not?

Does the fact that this question is locked diminish its value or the value of Stack Overflow in any way?

Of course, Stack Overflow is not made for interesting questions. Notice that I am not defending this descision, I am merely stating it. You know this, which is why you were accurately able to predict that this question would be closed. Why is this interesting enough to warrant commenting that this is the case also today?

[Turing_Machine]

At least 4/5 of the times it comes up in a Google search (for the stuff I search for, at least), some idiot moderator has closed the question.

The message that sends to me is "Your question isn't worthy of our site. Go away."

So, yeah, it does make using the site less pleasant, and thus reduces its value to me.

[wpietri]

Ditto. I stopped contributing to Stack Overflow because of this.

It's a classic example of cart-before-the-horse product thinking. Users aren't there to follow your orders; they're people with actual needs that you're trying to serve. I get that they don't want the site to be overrun with goofy content, because that prevents you from serving other actual needs. But there are better solutions than tasking a large number of people with running around and jerkily stomping out anything that doesn't fit the owners' precise vision.

I think this is the exact mistake that Friendster made. And really, the same one Google Plus made. Neither of those products were built for the users; they were built to serve the owners' desires.

[Turing_Machine]

Yes, the same with Wikipedia. The site has largely been taken over by people who are there simply to "be moderators".

[Turing_Machine]

And I see we have plenty of 'em here, too.