|
|
|
|
|
|
by nickff
4587 days ago
|
|
|
I did not confuse anything, you left the type of right undefined. I assumed that the undefined right could be either moral or legal, whereas you interpret "right" to mean "legal right" unless explicitly stated otherwise. This has been an unfortunate misunderstanding. |
|
|
No, the post I responded to was about the abolition of rights, which restricts it to the class of rights (legal, not moral) for which that phrase is meaningful.
Context matters.
> whereas you interpret "right" to mean "legal right" unless explicitly stated otherwise.
No, I interpret it to mean "legal right" when it is used in a context in which what is being discussed is only meaningful for legal rights.