|
|
|
|
|
by darklajid
4725 days ago
|
|
Really..? 'Attack'? Again: journal is already part of Fedora, enabled by default and doing its job. The whole discussion is whether a separate syslogd is going to be provided by default. Most people here _love_ Chef/Puppet etc. -> Just override the default and make sure that a syslogd is installed. Done. Nobody 'attacks' anything. Proponents of one module want to remove a redundancy. That's not an attack. Anecdote:
I happen to know a thing or two about Tomboy (note taking app, written for Mono). Someone thought that Mono is 'teh ev!l' and created GNote, a more or less line by line port of Tomboy to a different language. Some distributions replaced Tomboy with GNote, after being convinced that it's the better choice. That's not an attack, it's potentially lobbying - or just plainly a matter of choice. |
|
I'm writing this because I've been seeing the same sort of shifting promises when systemd assimilated udev. At first it was a trivial repository merge, just something to make the developers more comfortable, no impact to anyone else. Now building udev without systemd is unsupported, and some “cleanups” are made to tie udev to systemd and kmod. This doesn't benefit systemd but it hurts anyone who uses an alternative.
The same kind of breakage of alternatives is pushed on gnome via logind, and the kernel via cgroups. It would be myopic to focus on promises made in a particular thread and ignore most of systemd's history.