[drp4929]

Now a days, compiler writers sees zero reason to write inline assembly.

First of all, it throws a wrench in high level optimizer's analysis. Plus, compilers and processors are getting smarter day by day while inline assembly in shipping code becomes more and more untouchable everyday.

[tomjen3]

You have never written embedded code, or code to deal with low level hardware in drivers?

I haven't either, but I imagine ASM would be required here.

[pornel]

I've written code for GameBoy Advance which has no OS, just magic memory addresses, and didn't need any assembly. Even hblank interrupts could be implemented in C.

[snogglethorpe]

A typical reason to use assembly these days is for instructions the compiler doesn't output (for instance specialized instructions which are only useful for a kernel).

GCC's extended assembly at least (which clang/LLVM also support), allows one to specify constraints for asm() statements that let the compiler respect dependencies etc.