|
|
|
|
|
by eqreqeq
4872 days ago
|
|
>>So i guess everyone else whose time and money she is wasting outside of the RIAA is just acceptable collateral damage? Whose time and money? The government. Please, we wasted so much money already on senseless wars and security theater that this argument is silly at this point. >>Note that while they won't throw her in jail, it will come out of her paycheck, they'll also make her sell a lot of her assets, etc. One word: bankruptcy >>It's hard to predict, but instead of helping others and getting a good legal result, she may end up having wasted some RIAA money and fucked over a lot of people. What a great idea! OK, I'll grant you points on this one. Getting a bad precedent would not be a good idea. Although, note sure if that is even possible in this case so you just sound like you are fear mongering. How are people going to get fucked over? Are you sure you are not just spreading FUD? |
|
Yes i'm sure i'm not spreading FUD. It is entirely possible that the supreme court will take the case. If they made the decision that the ratio of damages like her case was okay, it would fuck over all the other similarly situated people who aren't just lying on the stand.