[throwa356262]

Yeah, it looks like he mixed up the responses from the study group and this resulted in multiple errors in the published version.

But it is also hard to take this seriously when many of these "concerned colleagues" openly entertain racist ideologies and oppose black professors on campus.

[phyalow]

https://open.substack.com/pub/nathancofnas/p/dei-fraud-and-c...

I would suggest it is a little more than a “mix up”. My alma mater has a responsibility here to act.

[Michelangelo11]

No, the issue was that he apparently took direct quotes from participants in another study, reworded them a little, and presented them as quotes from his own participants. This is all in TFA.

[DrScientist]

It can be simultaneously be true that some of his more vocal opponents support things like hereditarianism & erroneously conflate genetics with race [1], and there is also a case to answer in terms of this individuals scholarship.

[1] The social concepts of race doesn't actually map to meaningful genetically distinct pools - and to believe so, despite the clear scientific evidence to the contrary, shows a questionable attachment to the social concept of race.