[thyself5221]

Have a reason to believe that your product constitutes plagiarism: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06508v1

Copyright (c) 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. How-ever, permission to use this material for any other purposes must be obtained from the IEEE by sending a request to pubs-permissions at ieee.org

(blurred email in case of spams)

[junon]

That's a stretch. This isn't a new approach to such obfuscation. Also plagiarism would mean they ripped the source material verbatim or they at least copied the methodology and intentionally used the source material's findings as their own.

It's super unbelievable they needed to. This isn't novel.