|
|
|
|
|
|
by junon
12 days ago
|
|
|
That's a stretch. This isn't a new approach to such obfuscation. Also plagiarism would mean they ripped the source material verbatim or they at least copied the methodology and intentionally used the source material's findings as their own. It's super unbelievable they needed to. This isn't novel. |
|
|