[nyeah]

The article explains very clearly what these issues have to do with each other in this particular case.

[titanomachy]

I don’t agree. Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant in this case. And I’ve never heard anyone seriously argue that 16-year-olds shouldn’t have phones, or that 16-year-old girls are at fault when an old man secretly makes videos of them. Both these groups seem like imagined bogeymen that the article is railing against.

[nyeah]

>Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant

The article explains why that was not irrelevant.

[cmoski]

Who is saying 16yos shouldn't have phones though?

[JSR_FDED]

Maybe if you have a certain frame of reference? I found it impenetrable.