|
|
|
|
|
|
by titanomachy
15 days ago
|
|
|
I don’t agree. Whether or not these girls had phones, or social media, was irrelevant in this case. And I’ve never heard anyone seriously argue that 16-year-olds shouldn’t have phones, or that 16-year-old girls are at fault when an old man secretly makes videos of them. Both these groups seem like imagined bogeymen that the article is railing against. |
|
|
The article explains why that was not irrelevant.