[Joel_Mckay]

On occasion, as I often chose wisdom, logic, and indifferentism. =3

[mewpmewp2]

Do you mean those three things are what let you solve it, or that they're what kept you from solving it more often?

[Joel_Mckay]

Philosophical indifferentism is part of it for sure. lol =3

[mewpmewp2]

And what is the reason for indifferentism as opposed to atheistic agnosticism?

[Joel_Mckay]

Indeed, indifferentism must recognize both distinctive positions with similar regard. =3

[mewpmewp2]

I see, that totally makes sense. You got stuck there and there's just no way out.

[Joel_Mckay]

Indeed, indifferentism must recognize both positions with similar regard. Then address ambiguity with logic and wisdom. For example, Bayes' theorem projects a reasonable expectation given available data. =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q1dgn_C0AU