[mewpmewp2]

Do you mean those three things are what let you solve it, or that they're what kept you from solving it more often?

[Joel_Mckay]

Philosophical indifferentism is part of it for sure. lol =3

[mewpmewp2]

And what is the reason for indifferentism as opposed to atheistic agnosticism?

[Joel_Mckay]

Indeed, indifferentism must recognize both distinctive positions with similar regard. =3

[mewpmewp2]

I see, that totally makes sense. You got stuck there and there's just no way out.

[Joel_Mckay]

Indeed, indifferentism must recognize both positions with similar regard. Then address ambiguity with logic and wisdom. For example, Bayes' theorem projects a reasonable expectation given available data. =3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q1dgn_C0AU

[mewpmewp2]

Wouldn't Bayes and logic lead you to immediately believe that some claims, ideas, and beliefs may be more logically sound or matter more than others, steering you away from indifferentism, but the reason why I thought you might be stuck is because you were indifferent to moving away from it.