What are you trying to suggest? That people without the University degree who have been trained for monkey coding do exist? Sure but that's not what I was saying nor does it skew the picture in any significant way.
What I'm trying to convey and you fail to understand is the picture you have in your mind is very much affected by your reality. The fact that you don't see these bootcampers doesn't mean they don't exist.
As I said, your communication style is coming across as arrogant and disrespectful. Instead of asking for more clarification and giving a benefit of a doubt you chose to counterpoint with a trivial example, in which tbh I am hesitant to believe. I say this as someone who has worked across continents and across many different domains. None of the layoffs taking place do not involve laying off "bootcamp" people.
> Instead of asking for more clarification and giving a benefit of a doubt you chose to counterpoint with a trivial example
I didn't counterpoint with a trivial example I just pointed out that where I'm from there are some bootcamp people being layed off. If you don't like someone counter pointing you, sorry that's your problem not mine. I was neither disrespectful or arrogant.
> None of the layoffs taking place do not involve laying off "bootcamp" people.
And how am I the arrogant one here? You're full of absolutes and certainties and get pisssy when someone argues against your point.
Arrogant? I believe what I am saying is factual and pretty easy to check, if not already widely known if you read at least a tiny bit of tech news - so how about layoffs in Oracle, Intel, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, PayPal, Cisco, Dell, Atlassian, Epic Games, ASML, Verizon, ..., and this is all without mentioning startups because there's just too many of them and not many people know a lot about them etc. Which of these layoffs are the bootcamp people?
The problem I have with your "argument" is that it is unsubstantiated. And I already answered you earlier - it does not matter if such people exist because such people are not majority, unless you would like to support that hypothesis with some fact?