[witx]

> Instead of asking for more clarification and giving a benefit of a doubt you chose to counterpoint with a trivial example

I didn't counterpoint with a trivial example I just pointed out that where I'm from there are some bootcamp people being layed off. If you don't like someone counter pointing you, sorry that's your problem not mine. I was neither disrespectful or arrogant.

> None of the layoffs taking place do not involve laying off "bootcamp" people.

And how am I the arrogant one here? You're full of absolutes and certainties and get pisssy when someone argues against your point.

[menaerus]

Arrogant? I believe what I am saying is factual and pretty easy to check, if not already widely known if you read at least a tiny bit of tech news - so how about layoffs in Oracle, Intel, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, PayPal, Cisco, Dell, Atlassian, Epic Games, ASML, Verizon, ..., and this is all without mentioning startups because there's just too many of them and not many people know a lot about them etc. Which of these layoffs are the bootcamp people?

The problem I have with your "argument" is that it is unsubstantiated. And I already answered you earlier - it does not matter if such people exist because such people are not majority, unless you would like to support that hypothesis with some fact?

[witx]

I know this might be shocking but... You know there are other contries besides USA? There are layoffs in other countries as well? What? Yes I know wow such a suprise. Go look at a map once in a while. Now you can call me arrogant

I'm not doxxing myself by sending you news from my country.

> if such people exist because such people are not majority

Which is different from your absolute "there are none" argument.

[menaerus]

I live in Europe btw, and I am surrounded by people being layed off and none of them are the "bootcamp" developers. So, in order to support your view you'd really have to be more concrete, otherwise your response reads as short-viewed or even manipulative.