[D-Machine]

I'd prefer more proof / context than GP gave, but I personally find it very useful to see people making judgements about AI-assistance of articles. Almost no such articles are worth my time, and the more HN people saying it, the more I know not to click past the HN headline.

[roywiggins]

Pangram agrees it's 100% LLM written.

[LocalH]

But I'm sure you understand that AI-driven "AI detectors" have an error rate of probably 90%, right?

I've heard of people taking old writings from 30 years ago, feeding it to an AI detector, and being told "this is AI"

[roywiggins]

Pangram seems to be tuned to avoid false positives most of the time.