Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by LocalH 19 days ago
But I'm sure you understand that AI-driven "AI detectors" have an error rate of probably 90%, right?

I've heard of people taking old writings from 30 years ago, feeding it to an AI detector, and being told "this is AI"

1 comments

Pangram seems to be tuned to avoid false positives most of the time.