[gchamonlive]

It's not the prerogative of the lib provider to dictate which tech I'm going to use. Now it's LLMs and since this is a divisive topic because of the layoffs and intellectual properterty theft used to train the model people side with the maintainer. Just imagine, what if instead of LLM the author made their libs erase your project if you used NVidia? Sure NVidia is a shitty company with shitty anti-consumer practices, but why should the consumer be penalized? If I want to use qwen3.6 locally in my inference rig to crunch code I'm totally in my right. This is just childish.

[torben-friis]

I don't see it as fundamentally different to licences dictating personal vs commercial use, requiring attribution, etc.

People share their intellectual property however they see fit.

That's speaking about the general principle, I'm not discussing the specific actions taken by the link's author.

[gchamonlive]

I don't think in principle it applies either. Licenses are there to manage distribution and ownership not tech stack.

[skeledrew]

Legally, a license is applicable in any way the provider of the item with the license deems it to be. Unless there's a law/ruling in a relevant jurisdiction that explicitly states otherwise.

[gchamonlive]

"by using this lib you agree to give up your firstborn child to adoption". In any jurisdiction do we have to have an explicit law against sending your child to adoption? Because you can't make it illegal for people to put children to adoption, this is regular practice, so a license could enforce this?

[yetihehe]

If someone gives you conditions to which you don't agree, maybe don't use that lib?

Do you think you have some moral right to use the library and violate conditions to which you do not agree? Get another library or write your own.

[gchamonlive]

If the conditions are nefarious you have a moral imperative to disobey. That's called civil disobedience.

[skeledrew]

It can try, because you agreed by using the software. And if the owner/maintained tries, it'll be up to the lawyers and judge(s) to determine the way forward. Maybe it'll be found to be too onerous a request or something. But don't push the system; it might push back in a way that has repercussions for decades to come.