|
|
|
|
|
by epistasis
18 days ago
|
|
> So why not just shut down the website? Or remove the form entirely? That will ensure that you get no spam, right? Turns out that people have a tolerance for a non-zero amount of work, but still have a limit. Suggesting "turn off your website" is does not account for the desire to also provide some access. Treat people who host content as humans, just as we must treat users as humans. There are tradeoffs, suggesting "shut down your website unless you provide access everywhere" is worse on all fronts for everyone. |
|
Maybe, maybe not.
If block-heavy websites shut down entirely, we lose some content, but other content moves to block-minimal sites and the average user might be able to access more.
Also if there's no blocking crutch, and people get pushed into shutdown and are mad about it, they might fight harder for anti-spam technology and legal enforcement, which could improve the situation.