|
|
|
|
|
by Dylan16807
11 days ago
|
|
> There are tradeoffs, suggesting "shut down your website unless you provide access everywhere" is worse on all fronts for everyone. Maybe, maybe not. If block-heavy websites shut down entirely, we lose some content, but other content moves to block-minimal sites and the average user might be able to access more. Also if there's no blocking crutch, and people get pushed into shutdown and are mad about it, they might fight harder for anti-spam technology and legal enforcement, which could improve the situation. |
|
Because those are the only two countries that we've ever in the life of our business, had a legitimate order from.
It prevents the majority of credit card testing, but it is tempting to apply it to the whole site to reduce traffic and server load.