|
|
|
|
|
by dyauspitr
21 days ago
|
|
Test prep and actual education don’t have to be all that different. If the test is hard and comprehensive (ie random enough) preparing for the test will teach you a lot. You see this with the SATs where people preparing for it digest 3000+ vocabulary words, write tons of sample essays and really dig into grammar. Same with the MCATs, foreign doctors spend 1-2 preparing for the MCATs and because the tests are so comprehensive you end up learning everything you need to. Also, I think another very important thing is Asian students rely very little on the quality of the teacher. A lot of the work is self work and extra curricular tuitions. The average Asian is done with school and then goes to two or three hours of additional tuition. This isn’t like the bottom 5%. This is 95% of the student body. |
|
The ability to solve hard problems in artificial test conditions is a useful proxy for having learned what is being tested. But only if the test itself is irrelevant. If your future depends on test scores, most people start focusing on what is being tested over what they are actually supposed to learn.
All measurements are proxies. They never measure the thing they are supposed to. That's the essence of Goodhart's law. When people focus on what is being measured, they usually perform worse on whatever it was supposed to measure.
The actual quality of education is your overall contribution to the society over the expected baseline. It can never be measured for individuals but only in aggregate. And only decades after the fact.