[jltsiren]

You are confusing education with test scores.

The ability to solve hard problems in artificial test conditions is a useful proxy for having learned what is being tested. But only if the test itself is irrelevant. If your future depends on test scores, most people start focusing on what is being tested over what they are actually supposed to learn.

All measurements are proxies. They never measure the thing they are supposed to. That's the essence of Goodhart's law. When people focus on what is being measured, they usually perform worse on whatever it was supposed to measure.

The actual quality of education is your overall contribution to the society over the expected baseline. It can never be measured for individuals but only in aggregate. And only decades after the fact.

[dyauspitr]

I think you’re drawing too much of a distinction here. Education can be just learning for the test. What you’re being tested on can be the entirety of what you need to know. It’s working extremely well for all of Asia. There’s no reason we can’t take away something from that.

[jltsiren]

Education is about building and maintaining a successful society. People have different opinions on how to define success.

Learning for the test is just a pointless excercise. If some part of education has no goals beyond that, it should be abolished as a waste of people's time and money.