Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by flohofwoe 24 days ago
I may be wrong but I think a ramjet doesn't need Mach 5 to ignite, Mach 3 to 6 is just where it is most efficient at high altitudes.

E.g. early German experiments during WW2 based on the Lorin tube (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Lorin) only had to get to 320 km/h to start working:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronach_Lorin

2 comments

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kronach_Lorin

coal burning ramjet!

"It was initially proposed that a wire-mesh basket holding coal be mounted behind a nose air intake, protruding slightly into the airflow and ignited by a gas burner. [...] The air passing through the ramjet would take the gases from the burning coal ..."

Yes, not because it would be any better than the alternatives, but because this was one of countless "last ditch" efforts.
Ok, but the question still remains, how is it going to get up to the required speed? And in a way that is practical for a passenger plane?
I'm no aircraft engineer, but I guess it would use traditional jet engines to get up to some low Mach 1+ speed until the ramjet gets enough air to bite on.

My bet is that this hasn't been done yet simply because it wouldn't be economical (the technology itself is a century old and has been tried over and over again), and that the 'civilian ramjet aircraft' is just a feel good story for what will end up as purely military usage, and most likely not in an airplane, but in missiles (there are a couple ramjet engine missiles in use already, like the European Meteor).